This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Asset Management Integration Vs Asset Context Integration
Hi Darren,

The initial idea to differentiate between these was that asses management integration purely means that new assets in the CMDB are automatically connected to the SIEM system to enable security monitoring.

Asset context means that the context of those assets, such as the mentioned features of ownership, location, and also classification is available to the security monitoring system as well. This context can subsequently be used in correlations or to determine the risk of events (assets with higher classification carry a higher risk).

With a proper integration, you will get both. But this is not neccessarily the case. Hence, the differentation.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Asset Management Integration Vs Asset Context Integration - by robvanos - 04-16-2019, 06:38 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)